<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#039;s Virtual Earth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2007/01/googles-virtual-earth/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2007/01/googles-virtual-earth</link>
	<description>Prasenjeet Dutta&#039;s blog on Technology, Software and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasenjeet</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2007/01/googles-virtual-earth#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasenjeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2007/01/800#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Youtube was big too (as was Flickr when it was bought). I don&#039;t think &#039;bigness&#039; is a criteria for not buying, in fact a big and passionate community is a positive factor while acquiring.

Besides, creating content is a pain and once a lot of people have spent time (or money!) creating models for Second Life, so any competing v-world will definitely want some way to either connect with SL or users to use SL goodies on their world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube was big too (as was Flickr when it was bought). I don&#8217;t think &#8216;bigness&#8217; is a criteria for not buying, in fact a big and passionate community is a positive factor while acquiring.</p>
<p>Besides, creating content is a pain and once a lot of people have spent time (or money!) creating models for Second Life, so any competing v-world will definitely want some way to either connect with SL or users to use SL goodies on their world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metlin</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2007/01/googles-virtual-earth#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Metlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2007/01/800#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Purchasing? Maybe not - that might have happened a few years ago, but today Second Life is a little too big (and they know that they have enough customers and a need).

They might become &quot;investors&quot; or come to some kind of understanding.

That said, I think it is only a matter of time before Google gets into MMORPGs, one way or the other - especially given this new development. Gaming is lucrative by itself, but MMORPGs and the like (I am not sure what you&#039;d call Second Life) definitely seem to fill a niche for a sizeable chunk of the geek-crowd out there.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purchasing? Maybe not &#8211; that might have happened a few years ago, but today Second Life is a little too big (and they know that they have enough customers and a need).</p>
<p>They might become &#8220;investors&#8221; or come to some kind of understanding.</p>
<p>That said, I think it is only a matter of time before Google gets into MMORPGs, one way or the other &#8211; especially given this new development. Gaming is lucrative by itself, but MMORPGs and the like (I am not sure what you&#8217;d call Second Life) definitely seem to fill a niche for a sizeable chunk of the geek-crowd out there.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

