<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox&#039;s Slashdot Rendering Bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs</link>
	<description>Prasenjeet Dutta&#039;s blog on Technology, Software and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasenjeet</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasenjeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2004/10/729#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I agree, IE can be quite slow: check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggercon.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bloggercon.org&lt;/a&gt; in IE and in Mozilla for an extreme example. However, I think for 1997-era HTML 3.2 (which sites like Slashdot use) IE blows past Mozilla.

Of course, I may be feeling this because I&#039;ve been wincing every time Firefox screws up Slashdot (I do all my Slashdot reading on Firefox, the tabs are convenient).

About rendering problems for Indic languages, there are quite a few &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?format=simple&amp;order=relevance+desc&amp;bug_status=__open__&amp;product=Browser&amp;content=hindi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reported bugs&lt;/a&gt;, and given my (basic) knowledge of two Indian languages it seems most of the bugs have indeed been reported, at least for Hindi (that only leaves about 20 other Indic languages to debug).

More than testers, I believe there is a shortage of developers who can commit patches in for these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, IE can be quite slow: check out <a href="http://www.bloggercon.org/" rel="nofollow">bloggercon.org</a> in IE and in Mozilla for an extreme example. However, I think for 1997-era HTML 3.2 (which sites like Slashdot use) IE blows past Mozilla.</p>
<p>Of course, I may be feeling this because I&#8217;ve been wincing every time Firefox screws up Slashdot (I do all my Slashdot reading on Firefox, the tabs are convenient).</p>
<p>About rendering problems for Indic languages, there are quite a few <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?format=simple&#038;order=relevance+desc&#038;bug_status=__open__&#038;product=Browser&#038;content=hindi" rel="nofollow">reported bugs</a>, and given my (basic) knowledge of two Indian languages it seems most of the bugs have indeed been reported, at least for Hindi (that only leaves about 20 other Indic languages to debug).</p>
<p>More than testers, I believe there is a shortage of developers who can commit patches in for these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raefer Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Raefer Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2004/10/729#comment-33</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hardgrok.org/blog/item/slashfix-firefox-extension.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This Firefox extension&lt;/a&gt; fixes the Slashdot rendering bug.

And IE&#039;s renderer definitely doesn&#039;t &quot;kick Firefox&#039;s ass&quot;, in fact IE is both pretty slow and quite buggy (box model hack, anybody?).  I won&#039;t speak to issues with particular Indian languages (since I don&#039;t speak any of them) but those sound like legitimate bugs, since there probably aren&#039;t enough people testing with some of these languages.  If you don&#039;t file bug reports though, it&#039;ll never get fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hardgrok.org/blog/item/slashfix-firefox-extension.html" rel="nofollow">This Firefox extension</a> fixes the Slashdot rendering bug.</p>
<p>And IE&#8217;s renderer definitely doesn&#8217;t &#8220;kick Firefox&#8217;s ass&#8221;, in fact IE is both pretty slow and quite buggy (box model hack, anybody?).  I won&#8217;t speak to issues with particular Indian languages (since I don&#8217;t speak any of them) but those sound like legitimate bugs, since there probably aren&#8217;t enough people testing with some of these languages.  If you don&#8217;t file bug reports though, it&#8217;ll never get fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasenjeet</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasenjeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 11:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2004/10/729#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Kingsley, neither does it render Hindi very well. I discovered that today browsing &lt;a href=&quot;http://nuktachini.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;नुक्ता चीनी&lt;/a&gt;. Firefox would just not display headings like &quot;अटली चेहरा सामने आए, असली सुरत छुपी रहे&quot; right: the matras would just not combine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kingsley, neither does it render Hindi very well. I discovered that today browsing <a href="http://nuktachini.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">नुक्ता चीनी</a>. Firefox would just not display headings like &#8220;अटली चेहरा सामने आए, असली सुरत छुपी रहे&#8221; right: the matras would just not combine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2004/10/729#comment-31</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while since I read Slashdot in the regular mode -- I usually use the Slashdot-light mode, so don&#039;t see any problems. And oh, /. has _tonnes_ of rendering bugs. IE&#039;s renderer certainly kickas FF&#039;s ass. Twice on Slashdot ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I read Slashdot in the regular mode &#8212; I usually use the Slashdot-light mode, so don&#8217;t see any problems. And oh, /. has _tonnes_ of rendering bugs. IE&#8217;s renderer certainly kickas FF&#8217;s ass. Twice on Slashdot <img src='http://prasenjeet.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://prasenjeet.com/blog/2004/10/firefoxs-slashdot-rendering-bugs#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoszone.org/when/2004/10/729#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I use IE to read Tamil websites because FFox doesn&#039;t &quot;get&quot; the order of Tamil ligatures. I know, I should p&#039;bly file a bug report. WHen I&#039;m less lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use IE to read Tamil websites because FFox doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; the order of Tamil ligatures. I know, I should p&#8217;bly file a bug report. WHen I&#8217;m less lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

